Dars qilib, telefonda yozishib, video ham ko'rish — vaqtni tejaydigandek tuyuladi. Aslida miya bunday ishlamaydi.
Ko'pchilik o'zini “multitasker” deb hisoblaydi: inshoni yozib turib, Telegramga javob beradi, fonda esa YouTube ochiq. Lekin psixologlar uzoq vaqtdan beri bir narsani ta'kidlaydi: murakkab ishlarda miya ikki vazifani aynan bir vaqtda bajarmaydi. U ular orasida tez almashadi — va har bir almashish “narx”ga ega.
2001-yilda Joshua Rubinshteyn, Devid Meyer va Devid Evans tajriba o'tkazishdi: ishtirokchilar matematik masalalar va geometrik shakllarni saralash kabi vazifalar orasida almashib ishlashdi. Natija aniq edi — har safar vazifa almashganda vaqt yo'qotildi, vazifa qanchalik murakkab va notanish bo'lsa, yo'qotish shunchalik katta bo'ldi.
Amerika Psixologiya Assotsiatsiyasi (APA) tushuntirishicha, bitta almashish bir necha o'ndan bir soniya olishi mumkin. Bu oz tuyuladi — lekin bir soatda o'nlab marta telefonga qarasangiz, bu soniyalar daqiqalarga, daqiqalar esa soatlarga aylanadi.
Ikki ishni “birga” qilish — aslida ikkalasini ham yarim kuch bilan qilish.
Tadqiqotchilar almashishni ikki bosqichga ajratadi: avval miya maqsadni o'zgartiradi (“endi matematika emas, xabar yozaman”), keyin yangi vazifa qoidalarini “yuklaydi”. Har safar shu ikki bosqich qaytadan bajariladi. Shuning uchun aralash ishlash ko'proq xato va ko'proq charchoq olib keladi.
Insho yozish yoki SAT matematikasi kabi chuqur ish uchun eng yaxshi strategiya oddiy: bitta oyna, bitta vazifa, telefon esa boshqa xonada.
Manba: Rubinstein, Meyer & Evans, “Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task Switching”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: HPP, 2001; APA: Multitasking. Matn — o'zbek tilidagi erkin qisqacha bayon.
Homework, chatting on your phone and a video in the background feels like saving time. The brain does not actually work that way.
Many people think of themselves as good multitaskers: writing an essay while answering Telegram, with YouTube open in the background. Psychologists have long pointed out that for complex work the brain does not perform two tasks at exactly the same moment. It switches rapidly between them, and every switch has a price.
In 2001, Joshua Rubinstein, David Meyer and David Evans ran an experiment in which participants alternated between tasks such as solving arithmetic problems and sorting geometric shapes. The result was clear: every switch lost time, and the more complex and unfamiliar the task, the bigger the loss.
The American Psychological Association (APA) explains that a single switch may cost only a few tenths of a second. That sounds tiny, but glance at your phone dozens of times an hour and those fractions add up to minutes, and the minutes to hours.
Doing two things “together” really means doing both at half strength.
Researchers split a switch into two stages: first the brain changes its goal (“no more maths, now I reply to a message”), then it loads the rules of the new task. Both stages run again on every switch, which is why mixed work brings more mistakes and more fatigue.
For deep work such as essay writing or SAT maths, the best strategy is simple: one window, one task, and the phone in another room.
Source: Rubinstein, Meyer & Evans, “Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task Switching”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: HPP, 2001; APA: Multitasking. Text: a free summary.